Local Issues

  • Why are utility rates rising?

    Utility Rates:   Many citizens are asking the following questions:  

    Why are they going up?

    Why is there a profit transfer from utilities to the general fund?

    What is the demand charge and why is this being added to my bill?

    Costs for pretty much everything have been rising.  Gas, groceries, items at the hardware store, you name it.  As far as utilities go, the cost of the commodities that the department buys have been increasing.  The cost of labor is increasing, and the cost of materials has been increasing.  Not too many years ago, the Department of Public Utilities spent more than the revenues brought in, to the tune of ten million dollars or so.  They couldn’t collect as much as they spent because some of the utility rates were capped by statute.  Although the Department of Public Utilities has reserve funds that are for this purpose, the funds are mandated to be at a certain level.  The extra money that the DPU spent depleted these founds and the DPU began strategizing how to both replenish these funds and to pay for the increased cost of the commodities going forward. The DPU, as with any business for that matter, cannot exist if it spends more money than what it receives.

    To make matters more confusing, there is something called a “profit transfer” that occurs.  This is a transfer from the utility accounts to the general fund.  I have asked about this and it has been described as a franchise fee.  It was further explained that this money is returned to the DPU for utility capital projects.  Nevertheless, on the surface, it doesn’t look good.  It looks like the DPU is making so much money that they have to transfer the extra money to the General Fund.  If this is the case, why would the DPU have to raise rates to be sustainable? 

    The Board of Public Utilities recently voted to do away with the “Profit Transfer” because it does not accurately describe the situation.  Will it change anything?  No, because this money will now be spent on capital projects directly instead of going to the general fund and then being returned to the utility department.  I recommend that citizens vote YES on Ordinance 758, to remove “profit transfer” from the County Charter.

    Customers will start seeing a “Demand Charge” on their electricity bills.  The “Demand” is the peak electricity usage, averaged over a one-hour period, for the month.  For example, a 30-day month consists of 720 hours.   Each of these 720 segments will have a power draw associated with it.  During the night, or when people are at work, the electrical draw will be pretty low.  If a family has a car charger, the demand of the car charger could be around 20kW.  If this car charger is on for one hour, and there are other loads that add up to 5kW for that same hour, the demand is 25kW.  The demand charge is $1 for each kW in the highest one-hour period.  In the above example, a $25 demand charge would be applied over and above the monthly electricity bill.  I voted against the Demand Charge, but it passed. 

  • League of Women Voters Guide Q&A

    1. Q. Describe your qualifications and experiences that have prepared you to serve as a County Councilor.
      A. I’ve been a member of the Board of Public Utilities
      for the past 6 years. In that time I have interacted
      with County Council, different boards, and County
      Legal. I’m familiar with the structure of County
      Government.
    2. Q. The community consistently ranks affordable housing and economic development as top priorities for the County. What actions can the County Council take to address them?
      A. There is not as much available land as there are empty buildings. LANL is hiring more people and they will need places to live. I will work with the Council and LANL to investigate opportunities to work together to provide more
      housing. Building higher structures in the place of empty buildings might be an option.
    3. A. This year, the County is updating its Comprehensive Plan, which articulates the County’s vision for land use, housing, transportation, economic development, and environmental stewardship. One of the most pressing issues is the question of growth. How much and where do you think the County should grow? What quality-of-life tradeoffs do you think the community will need to consider?
      A. The County does not have many options in terms of accessing more land. We are surrounded by DOE, tribal lands, and BLM. We can work with LANL to see if there are mutually beneficial opportunities. In terms of population growth,
      yes, there are trade-offs. More traffic, possibility for more crime. More kids in schools, altering the teacher-student ratio. Strained medical care. Growth is inevitable and these will be some of the challenges we will have to face.
    4. Q. The County’s budget includes a substantial number of unfunded Capital Improvement Projects. How would you prioritize which projects to fund?
      A. Prioritize the projects that benefit the highest number of people and resonate with the community.
  • Why I Am Running

    Dear Friends:
    I have been a part of the Los Alamos community for 13 years and work at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. For six of those years I have served on the Board of Public Utilities, so I am familiar with County government. Los Alamos is a special town with great people, but I am concerned that our County Council is only hearing from a small part of the community. With that in mind, I have decided to run for County Council, with hopes to represent a greater portion of the community.

    It is a challenge to communicate all that the County is involved in. They have a website with lots of information, published agendas, and studies from consultants, but information that is relevant to the community often gets buried and is difficult to find. More often than not, the County makes a decision and the community learns about it later on. Examples include the new electricity demand charges that the Council passed (and I opposed), the Trinity Road Diet, and the $2.1M camera surveillance system.

    I want to hear from the people of Los Alamos concerning what is most important to the community. I look at issues with a very broad perspective. We don’t solve problems, we trade problems. Every issue and proposed solution needs to be weighed for unintended consequences.

    If I am elected to County Council, I will:

    1. Vote against initiatives where the Council is trying to dictate how people live.
    2. Question unfunded and intrusive County mandates
    3. Work with the building office to create a more fair and consistent permit process.
    4. Oppose unnecessary increases in taxes, fees, or rates.
    5. Represent, communicate with, and engage the larger community for Council decisions.
    6. Approach all issues holistically